Since 2022, Ukrainian nationals in Europe have faced an increasingly complex legal environment. Some are fleeing conflict. Others are business figures with cross-border exposure. A smaller number are caught in extradition proceedings — often initiated not by Ukraine itself, but by third states, including Russia and former Soviet bloc jurisdictions that continue to use international legal channels as instruments of pressure. For any Ukrainian citizen facing criminal accusations abroad or an extradition request, the situation demands specialist counsel — not a generalist firm, and not reliance on the assumption that courts will automatically recognise the political context.
One clarification upfront: Collegium of International Lawyers is not an official government website, not a Ukrainian state agency, and not affiliated with INTERPOL. The firm represents private clients navigating extradition hearings, INTERPOL notices, and mutual legal assistance (MLA) requests — including cases with a direct Ukrainian dimension.
Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 transformed the geopolitical backdrop against which legal proceedings unfold. European courts are now more alert to the possibility that extradition requests originating from Russia or Russian-aligned jurisdictions may be politically motivated. But heightened awareness is not automatic protection. Ukrainian nationals must still navigate extradition hearings, detention orders, provisional arrest requests, and INTERPOL notices — each requiring a concrete, evidence-based legal response.
Mutual legal assistance requests have also become a tool of concern. A state that cannot secure extradition may still submit MLA requests resulting in asset freezes, document seizures, or cross-border cooperation that compromises a client's position. Defending against MLA abuse requires a strategy that runs in parallel to the extradition defence — not as an afterthought.
One of the most underestimated risks for Ukrainian nationals is the INTERPOL diffusion notice. Unlike a formal Red Notice, a diffusion is circulated directly between national bureaux without central INTERPOL review. It can trigger arrest with minimal procedural safeguard — and by the time a client is detained, the damage is already done.
This is precisely what occurred in a case handled by Collegium of International Lawyers involving a businessman who held dual Ukrainian and Austrian citizenship. In 2020, Russian authorities accused him of fraudulently misappropriating state budget funds connected to a USD 17 million industrial equipment contract — a deal whose failure arose from subcontractor complications rather than any act attributable to the client. He was placed on INTERPOL's international wanted list and, on 8 April 2022, was apprehended in Hungary based on a diffusion notice.
The Metropolitan Court of Budapest ruled against extradition — the charges were already time-barred under Hungarian law. But the legal team then pursued deletion of the underlying INTERPOL data, arguing that Russian authorities never explained why they did not engage Austria (where the client formally resided), and that the only conduct attributed to the client was signing a commercial contract. The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files agreed: the data lacked a clear factual basis, the case was civil or commercial in character, and processing did not comply with INTERPOL's own rules. Deletion was ordered.
This case shows why extradition defence and INTERPOL data deletion must be pursued in tandem — especially when the requesting state has a documented pattern of weaponising international legal tools.
Not every criminal defence lawyer understands international extradition law. Not every extradition lawyer understands the INTERPOL system. And very few practitioners have direct experience with the CCF deletion process, MLA defence, and multi-jurisdictional coordination simultaneously.
Dr. Anatoliy Yarovyi, Senior Partner at Collegium of International Lawyers, brings a background directly relevant to Ukrainian and Eastern European cases. He holds a Master's degree from Lviv University — grounding him in post-Soviet legal systems, their procedural patterns, and the ways in which criminal process can be instrumentalised in politically sensitive contexts. Dr. Yarovyi also holds a degree from Stanford University and has specialised in representation before the European Court of Human Rights and INTERPOL in matters involving extradition, data protection, and freedom of movement.
That profile is directly relevant when advising a Ukrainian national detained on a Russian-sourced notice, challenging MLA requests backed by documentation from jurisdictions with compromised judicial independence, or building proceedings where both the client's nationality and the requesting state's motives carry legal weight.
The legal exposure facing Ukrainian nationals in European courts today is real and, in some cases, deliberately engineered. Specialist advice from a firm experienced in extradition, INTERPOL defence, and post-Soviet legal dynamics is not a luxury — it is the baseline requirement for a viable defence. Dr. Anatoliy Yarovyi and the team at Collegium of International Lawyers are available for confidential initial consultations.
If you need legal advice on extradition, INTERPOL notices, Red Notice removal, preventive requests, or cross-border criminal defence strategy, contact Collegium of International Lawyers.